In a concerning trend, it appears that mainstream media outlets are working overtime to reshape narratives, all seemingly in an effort to bolster Kamala Harris's public image. Here are five recent instances where the media's spin has been particularly egregious:
1. CBS Denies Harris's Support for Minnesota Freedom Fund
CBS recently challenged claims that Kamala Harris donated to the Minnesota Freedom Fund, which was used to bail out individuals during the George Floyd riots. This fund, controversially, has been linked to the release of "dangerous criminals." However, Harris's promotion of the fund on X (formerly Twitter), where she encouraged donations, is well-documented and public.
2. Biden's 'Voluntary' Departure to 'Save Democracy'
The narrative that President Biden gracefully "stepped down" to protect democracy is misleading. Reports suggest that Biden was pressured by top Democrats, who allegedly used threats to ensure his departure. This version of events contrasts sharply with the media's portrayal of a willing and noble withdrawal.
3. JD Vance's Alleged Indiscretion
A bizarre and unsubstantiated claim circulated by the media suggested that JD Vance engaged in inappropriate behavior with a couch cushion. The Associated Press initially fact-checked this outlandish claim as false but later retracted their correction, citing a failure to follow their editing process. The incident raises questions about the integrity and accountability of media fact-checking.
4. The DEI Controversy Surrounding Harris's VP Selection
The media has recently downplayed or denied the idea that Kamala Harris was chosen as Vice President based on her gender and ethnicity. However, President Biden's own statements in 2020 made it clear that these factors were crucial in his decision-making process. The denial of this aspect by the media appears to be an attempt to obscure the reality of identity politics at play.
5. The Disappearing 'Border Czar' Role
Perhaps the most blatant rewrite is the media's sudden backtracking on Harris's role as the Border Czar. Reports dating back to 2021 consistently referred to Harris being in charge of addressing the border crisis. Yet, recent efforts to erase this narrative suggest a deliberate attempt to distance her from the ongoing issues at the border.
REPORT: The media is currently rewriting history in an effort to help the Harris campaign.
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) July 26, 2024
Here are 5 hoaxes the media has launched in the past week.
5. CBS claims Trump is lying by saying Harris donated to Minnesota Freedom Fund, bailing out “dangerous criminals” during the… pic.twitter.com/HEjlJnE8Kx
These instances reflect a troubling pattern of media manipulation, where facts are selectively presented or outright altered to shape public perception. For conservatives, this not only represents a challenge to honest journalism but also raises broader concerns about the manipulation of information to serve political ends. As always, it is crucial to scrutinize such narratives critically and seek out the full context behind the headlines
